NASA Human Exploration Rover Challenge (HERC)

"How can a steering system be designed to perform under real constraints while remaining intuitive to ride?"

The NASA Human Exploration Rover Challenge (HERC) challenges student teams to build a human-powered rover capable of safely navigating rough and unpredictable terrain. As part of the RISD Rover team, I designed and tested the rover’s steering system, addressing strict constraints on weight, performance, space packaging, and durability while delivering intuitive, rider-friendly control.

Competition Scope

Teams are evaluated on successful mission task completion, efficiency within the time limit (including penalties), and safe, reliable control across terrain without failures or rule violations.

Here are more about the competition rules on the HERC official website

Design Challenges

As most teams come from engineering schools, RISD Rover, as a design-based team, focused on creating a more integrated and lightweight rover, maintaining a three-wheel configuration (a trike like the right imag) for its simplicity, performance, and weight efficiency.

However, some subsystems , like the steering, demanded deep theoretical and mechanical understanding, which involves complex geometric calculation. I took on this challenge, guiding the process from studying steering mechanisms and exploring alternative concepts.

Physical Testing

The best way to understand how the length, connections, and geometry of steering components influence variables such as bump steer, steering angle, and stability is to physically test and evaluate them.

Study cardboard modles to understand steering geometry.

Sketch for integration of the steering system onto the chasis.

Crank (Four-Bar) Steering

Horizontal (Bearing) Steering

A dual-pivot four-bar linkage that allows more optimal tie-rod geometry, achieving larger steering angles and reduced bump steer while maintaining intuitive side-to-side control.

A centrally pivoted handlebar system that mirrors bicycle ergonomics but is constrained by chassis geometry, resulting in limited steering angle and increased bump steer under uneven terrain.

Evaluation

We evaluated the two steering systems based on the following aspects:

Comparison of Overall Performance between the IB (Indirect Bearing System) and the C4B (Crank Four-Bar System).

As well as ergonomic factors:

Fabrication in Carbon Fiber

We move on to the crank steering system because it is easier to fabricate and don't invovle space packaging issue that the horizontal steering does.

Based on the strenth test performed on joints and connecting points, the shape of crank arm went through iterations.

Start from thinnest carbon fiber layout, and break it to see its maximum strenth and stiffness, then add more layers for the next round.

Result

We temporarily mounted the system onto the chassis, where it operated smoothly, and are now ready to move into the next stage. Once the full rover is assembled, we will conduct real-world testing.

DIY a 3D Printer
Adaptive Landing Gear
©FangzhuoTang 2025